90.9 WBUR - Boston's NPR news station
Top Stories:
PLEDGE NOW
Reporter Michael Hastings on Gen. McChrystal

The man in charge of the war in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, landed himself in hot water with the White House (and has now resigned) after a profile in Rolling Stone depicted the general and his staff criticizing the President and other top civilian officials. 

We spoke with Michael Hastings — the reporter who wrote the article — on Wednesday morning from Kandahar to talk about the controversy.  Here’s what he told us:

Q (Tom Ashbrook): You’re still in Afghanistan, you’re in Kandahar, and we understand you’ve been under rocket fire today.  What’s happening? 

A (Michael Hastings): Yes, there was just a rocket fire attack here and we all ducked under our desks and went into the bunker, and then the electricity went out but everything is fine now.

Q: Michael, how long were you with General McChrystal and his crew and in what kind of circumstances to get this sort of dope? 

A: It was a month from April to, from mid-April to mid-May. 

Q: And in what kind of, I mean were you at the bars with him? 

A:  I met him in Paris

Q: Sorry Michael we’ve got a delay here, just trying to get a sense of what kind of environments you met with them in.  Where they were talking so glibly, loosely, even offensively, about their colleagues in the civilian wing, in the administration. 

A:  Well it was very unusual to see a general in that environment.  He had come over to Europe on a NATO tour and so I saw him in Paris as well as in Berlin and spent some time with him.  I happened to also spend his wedding anniversary with him and his senior-level staff.  Where they proceeded to get fairly inebriated, which one would expect from some infantry guys, you know out on the town in Paris.  So a number of these experiences were just much different from the normal profile you get of a general when you fly around a battlefield with him, whether in Iraq or Afghanistan.  So it’s a sort of unique opportunity and I was lucky to have it.  

Q: What was General McChrystal’s response when his top aides were more or less trash-talking the administration?  For example, when an aide called Vice President Biden, “bite me” right next to McChrystal, did the general laugh? Was he in on the game?

A: Oh yeah, no, he laughed, certainly.  You know, this is their humor and I think the humor reflects something more.  I think reflects a disdain for the civilian leadership in a way. And that’s how it comes out.  I mean, I think, you know, obviously Vice President Biden is a subject of a number of jokes but I think – a —  if you’re a general it’s probably not wise to criticize him too openly and b, not when a reporter who you just met walks into the room and has his notepad out.

 Q: Did they know that you were there?  Did they notice you scribbling notes, Michael? 

A: Oh yeah I had my tape recorder and notepad out most of the time.  So it was always sort of unclear to me, you know, what was their motivation of allowing me in and all of this access.  I think there’s a number of factors that were involved, but I think an important one is that they had had a number of very flattering profiles done on them over the past year and so they were accustomed to sort of allowing access and having reporters play ball so they could give them more access later.  Well, that’s not really a game I’m interested in playing.   

Q: Did you have any sense that General McChrystal and his staff were trying to send a message to the White House through you?

A:  I thought that because, again, as I was sort of walking through the different rationales of why the staff and he would be telling me the things they told me I think there was obviously some very serious frustration they have about the direction of the policy, especially on the diplomatic side.  I think also they have a history (and when I say “they” I mean General McChrystal and the people around him) of what I call sort of throwing hand grenades into the pond.  They like to shake things up. They like to shock the system. What better way than to do a profile in Rolling Stone? It’s cool, you’re going to reach a younger audience perhaps, it’s going to be a little edgy and maybe you can even get some sort of policy points out there along the way, or sort of sentiments.  Perhaps it was just a miscalculation.  It’s really…you’d have to ask them and I’m sure they have an interesting explanation but it should be pointed out their response to the story has been to just apologize, which essentially is not even disputing it.   

Q: Michael, the general is in the hot seat, in the White House today.  But reading your piece, he did not make the most incendiary remarks.  There were some critical remarks from General McChrystal but they were rather measured.  Has this piece sort-of unfairly bound him up in the more trash-talky comments of his subordinates?

A: I don’t think so.  I mean, I think leadership comes from the top, especially in an organization that General McChrystal runs.  I think a lot of the sentiments that his people reflect also reflects his own views.  And I’m fairly confident of that.  You know, whether or not it’s fair for him to have been tied up in all of this, you know, my goal is to write a story that’s as accurate, truthful about what I see and what I hear and what’s really going on.  The sort of consequences of that are out of my control, so I just try to focus on sort of telling people what I think is actually happening, not the sort of normal spin that we seem to get.

Q: Michael, what’s the fundamental conflict here?  Is this just a personality conflict, though that could be big in itself.  Are you reporting really about a conflict in war strategy, war execution?

A: Well I think there are serious conflicts in terms of what the vision that President Obama has for his Afghan strategy versus what the strategy became.  I mean, if you go back to President Obama’s comments in March of 2009, he sets out to sort of narrow the aims of our goal in Afghanistan.  And then all of a sudden the general he chooses goes and does the exact opposite and essentially expands our aims exponentially. So we went from the beginning of the Obama administration about 150 Western troops in Afghanistan to now almost 150,000.  Which is not a narrowing of aims in any sense of the word.

So I think that is the fundamental conflict, and the fact that policy that Obama tried to launch just got out of his control.  He had no control over it.

Q: Michael, you’re still in Kandahar, I was a little surprised after dropping a bombshell like this in Rolling Stone that you would still be in Afghanistan.  What’s the reception you’re getting today from troops, from commanders there? You just essentially put the top commander in the hot seat in the White House, maybe his career at-risk.  What’s the reaction you’re getting on the ground?

A: Troops have been very positive about, a lot have come up to me and said “hey man, cool story.” A lot agree on the rules of engagement piece of the story. I think I probably just saw a dirty look from others, so not everybody obviously agrees, but yeah, the reaction has been actually overwhelmingly positive. And people think “hey, you know if your relationship with the White House is like that, that needs to get out there.” I think there’s also been surprise among the soldiers that General McChrystal would talk to Rolling Stone and also among the younger soldiers they think it’s sort of cool and they’ve also let me know that. But otherwise, everybody’s been great.

Q: Michael Hastings, the reporter who put the story in Rolling Stone joined us from Kandahar in Afghanistan.  Michael, be safe, thanks for joining us.

A: Thanks for having me, appreciate it.

Please follow our community rules when engaging in comment discussion on this site.
  • Joe

    Hastings enjoy your 15 minutes of fame, your career is over as well, no one in their right mind would trust you.

  • Jane

    I cannot believe one man–Michael Hastings can take down a GENERAL how pitiful

  • Nancy

    Michael,
    It is clear, to me, that you had an agenda here. Congratulations. It appears that you succeeded. Was it worth it or have you not looked that far down the road?

  • Morrison

    I say BRAVO for unbiased journalism! Read my tribute at http://www.plaidradish.wordpress.com

  • DREz

    How can this guy sleep at night now?

  • David

    Shame on Hastings for interviewing McChrystal and his staff when they were “fairly inebriated” and then reporting the comments out of context, as if they were sober. It was obviously his intention to manufacture a soop.

    Shame on Tom Ashbrook for letting him get away with it.

  • Emily

    Michael Hastings should not be proud of his story.

    A responsible reporter would have understood that this was gossip, and perhaps have taken notes to use at another time, not as a news story.
    His reporting reflects a media culture which makes gossip into news, in the same way as our media follows some celebrity’s pregnancy and breakup with husband.
    It’s also the flip side of the dilemma of the reporter viewing an atrocity–does he help the victim or take the picture.

  • Lillee1

    By the comments here it’s obvious that today people don’t know what a reporter does because so many reporters no longer do it. Warning: If a reporter is in the room it’s all reportable. It’s not a date. It’s not like taking “advantage” of a drunk teenager. These are very grown men. Reporters are there for a story. Not to be your friend. (Though I wouldn’t hang around if I were him. Talk about ”miscalculating”. I don’t care what nice little comments troops have given him. He very well could meet with his own “friendly fire”.)

    On the other hand I read the entire article in “Rolling Stone” and I don’t see a “fireable offense” here. This is the general who lied and said a football star was KIA when he was killed under friendly fire and he was PROMOTED. But someone in the room says something snide about the Vice President and you’re fired? Where is the priority here? There was also torture stuff associated with the general but I couldn’t quite grasp that in the article. But it didn’t affect his advancements. The press never went after him for all that.

    The Administration and America need to grow up. You give an organization–what did the article say?–50 BILLION dollars and they sure as hell are going to become an entity on to themselves with nothing but contempt for the civilian 5 billion dollar leadership. They are armed, dangerous, and ready to kill on their terms. We want war to be all warm and fuzzy and be about freedom. But it’s always ugly and about money. McChrystal didn’t fail. He is a natural consequence of weapons, power, and endless cash-flow. He’s a mob leader. Axe the mob leader and the same thing will replace him.

    Finally, with this COIN thing, it’s obvious that the Middle Eastern Wars are indefinite. Yesterday, Iraq. Today Afghanistan. Tomorrow, Iran. It’s good for Halliburton. All that oil. All those minerals. All that nation building at taxpayer expense.

  • Yvonne

    Some of the comments here display not just a lack of understanding of real reporting, but also of our system of government and the real dangers of military takeover that our system has safeguards against. Dozens of countries have had military coups in the last few decades – the reason we haven’t has to do with keeping these safeguards healthy.

    I’m not in the military, but I understand chain of command! This general challenged Obama’s authority pretty directly, and so forced Obama’s hand by putting material like this out to the public. Obama had to either retire an excellent general or be perceived as weak politically AND risk worse military challenges to the civilian government in the future.

    So this was a lose-lose situation for Obama, and this general has betrayed his duty to his commander-in-chief and country by challenging Obama, and our system of government, in such a way from within, during a war/conflict.

    I usually don’t think of myself as highly patriotic, but this situation stepped past very important limits.

  • Joe

    Near the end of the Q&A, Hastings reveals not only his agenda, but a complete lack of understanding of the Obama approved Afghanistan policy, and how, in general, military plans are implemented.

    “I think there are serious conflicts in terms of what the vision that President Obama has for his Afghan strategy versus what the strategy became. I mean, if you go back to President Obama’s comments in March of 2009, he sets out to sort of narrow the aims of our goal in Afghanistan. And then all of a sudden the general he chooses goes and does the exact opposite and essentially expands our aims exponentially.”

    Nevermind the assumption that he would be consulted on changing Secret or Top Secret level war plans, he assumes the plan to be implemented when McCrystal was appointed has been hijacked from an incompetent and clueless White House

    “So we went from the beginning of the Obama administration about 150 Western troops in Afghanistan to now almost 150,000. Which is not a narrowing of aims in any sense of the word.”

    Hastings shows his ignorance of the plan that Obama hired McChrystal for: the Afghan “surge.” McChrystal reworked the surge strategy that Gen Petraeus sucessfully designed for Iraq, to dramatically, but temporarily increase the troop presence.

    “So I think that is the fundamental conflict, and the fact that policy that Obama tried to launch just got out of his control. He had no control over it.”

    Well thank goodness for our condescending journalist. Poor incompetent Obama needs help from reporters because policy “just got out of his control. He had not control over it.”

  • kim

    Let’s face it: with an irrational ennemy like the Talibans, who do not mind to kill their own people who disagree with them, there’s no way we can win in Afghanistan. President Obama should find a way to cut our loss.

    I’m grateful to Michael Hasting for presenting to us how the US strategy has been executed in Afghanistan. I hope President Obama and General Petraeus can find a way to get out of that country.

  • RpbertC

    I wonder how Michael Hastings sleeps at night knowing he destroyed the career of a decent man who has served his country with honor. Hastings sure can’t say that about himself.

  • Tom

    Any employee that talks trash about his boss and subverts his authority should certainly expect to be fired.

    Why is that so hard for so many commenters to understand?

ONPOINT
TODAY
Apr 25, 2014
President Barack Obama and ASIMO, an acronym for Advanced Step in Innovative MObility, bow to each other during a youth science event at the National Museum of Emerging Science and Innovation, known as the Miraikan, in Tokyo, Thursday, April 24, 2014. (AP)

Guns in Georgia. Obama in Asia. Affirmative Action. And Joe Biden in Ukraine. Our weekly news roundtable.

Apr 25, 2014
In this Saturday, Aug. 11, 2012 file photo, employees of the New Hampshire state health department set up a temporary clinic at the the middle school in Stratham, N.H., to test hundreds of people for hepatitis C related to an outbreak at nearby Exeter Hospital. A new drug, Sovaldi, is said to successful treat more than 90 percent of Hepatitis C patients. (AP)

Super expensive miracle drugs. How much can we afford to pay?

RECENT
SHOWS
Apr 24, 2014
A Buddhist monk lights the funeral pyre of Nepalese mountaineer Ang Kaji Sherpa, killed in an avalanche on Mount Everest, during his funeral ceremony in Katmandu, Nepal, Monday, April 21, 2014.  (AP)

A Sherpa boycott on Everest after a deadly avalanche. We’ll look at climbing, culture, life, death and money at the top of the world.

 
Apr 24, 2014
Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, left, talks with Sen. Ed Hernandez, D-Covina at the Capitol in Sacramento, Calif., Monday, April 21, 2014. Hernandez proposed a constitutional amendment that would ask voters to again allow public colleges to use race and ethnicity when considering college applicants. The proposal stalled this year after backlash from Asian Americans. (AP)

California as Exhibit A for what happens when a state bans affirmative action in college admissions. We’ll look at race, college and California.

On Point Blog
On Point Blog
Up At Everest Base Camp, ‘People Still Don’t Know The Ramifications’
Thursday, Apr 24, 2014

With a satellite phone call from Mount Everest’s Base Camp, climber and filmmaker David Breashears informs us that the Everest climbing season “is over.”

More »
Comment
 
The Week In Seven Soundbites: April 18, 2014
Friday, Apr 18, 2014

Holy week with an unholy shooter. South Koreans scramble to save hundreds. Putin plays to the crowd in questioning. Seven days gave us seven sounds.

More »
Comment
 
Our Week In The Web: April 18, 2014
Friday, Apr 18, 2014

Space moon oceans, Gabriel García Márquez and the problems with depressing weeks in the news. Also: important / unnecessary infographics that help explain everyone’s favorite 1980′s power ballad.

More »
Comment